A ‘hit-piece’ was not what I saw.

Re: Augusta Calls Film a “hit piece”, The Weekly Bulletin, 10/3/2012

On September 29th, I had the opportunity to watch the brief documentary Cyanide Beach which traces the recent history of some ill-fated mining ventures, in Italy and elsewhere, and the recurring faces who populate the Corporate Boards of the shifting projects. Augusta Mining, responsible for one of the new thrusts in Arizona towards strip mining, labeled the film a hit-piece, claiming a chain of loose and even false comparisons. But a hit-piece is not what I saw. As a Ph.D. researcher, I perceived careful work and statement of fact by the film maker, letting the audience largely draw their own conclusions.  Rather than “guilt by association,” the film detailed industry guilt in environmental matters, and then asks reasonable questions about the associations. Career executives and investors involved in long-suspended projects do resurface years later involved in others, and thus the question is quite reasonable: will the new projects work out for their communities any better than the old ones? The industry spokespersons try to draw a stark separation between old projects and new ones, but the film stays with its facts. If past is prologue, should we be nervous about the future of mining? The facts, and the questions, are provocative.

David Budd, Ph.D., Patagonia, Arizona

Read film maker, John Dougherty’s column in Green Valley News on Augusta Resource executives’ history of deception.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This